The GHG reporting ecosystem continues to develop and update, but the core GHG Protocol which now underpins most GHG reporting frameworks and laws has had very little change since 2011.
This article provides a brief comparison of how the state of GHG reporting in Australia, Canada, USA, UK and Europe.
In March 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) decided to adopt a new rule requiring publicly listed companies to disclose climate-related risks and GHG emissions.
Requirements:
GHGRP (Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program):
GHG Protocol Alignment:
Canada uses a combination of federal facility-based reporting and corporate-level ESG disclosure guidance.
Requirements:
GHG Protocol Alignment:
Australia has significantly upgraded its sustainability disclosure regime through the creation of the ASRS, developed by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) in line with ISSB’s IFRS S1 and S2.
Requirements:
GHG Protocol Alignment:
The UK was among the first countries to mandate TCFD-aligned climate disclosures for both listed and large private companies.
Requirements:
GHG Protocol Alignment:
The EU has attempted to implement one of the most advanced sustainability reporting regime through the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
Requirements:
GHG Protocol Alignment:
Country/Region | Mandatory GHG Reporting | Scope 3 Required? | GHG Protocol Alignment |
---|---|---|---|
USA | Public firms - Yes, EPA GHGRP at facility level | No | Aligned (SEC); Compatible (GHGRP) |
Canada | Public firms - paused, CA GHGRP at facility level | Eventually | Aligned |
Australia | Large - 2026, Rest 2027-2028 | Yes | Explicitly required |
UK | Large - Yes, Rest - No | Sometimes | Aligned |
EU | Large - 2028, Rest - No | Yes | Aligned |